Alignment

There’s no such thing, alignment.
In life as in nature, alignment is an abstract concept provided to simulate a specific orientation between something or someone. In a given situation this conceptual and impossible rule can only be materialized as other things, that people tend to misuse as alignment.

Clash or opposition can only be a form of alignment if the context is able to provide a positive construction of content. In some cases this is the expected and felt result but in reality and by opposition we tend to juggle a power balance between the parts. One loses, the other wins, even if they are aligned in the end result. Deceiving, this continues to unsettle the concept of alignment in future iterations because the power shifts with the apparent alignment.

Parallelism or empathy is even worst. People tend to think in general terms and generate in their minds the common reality that others (juggling again in the balance of power) infringe to them as a true context. This is mass murder of the individual in the name of alignment and can only destroy the possibility of it because it’s not a spontaneous reality.

Maybe intersection in time and or in space can be a more defined type of alignment, just and because this momentarily and finite peculiarity is in itself a singular dot of impossibility. When two people or events seem aligned by intersecting dimensions they are in reality in a flat plan of interaction, but if you could see the z depth of that same intersecting lines they can be eons apart. While momentarily crossed.

So, there’s no such thing as alignment. There’s no such thing as love also. There’s only acceptance and respect, integration and enjoyable evolution of every life events we are able to live.

People tend to misuse concepts at their pleasure only to satisfy their minds about the impossible(?) reasoning of life.

the MONSTRUKTOR